The Intelligence Collaborative

Comment

Comment by Arik Johnson on March 7, 2010 at 9:28pm

Andrew, I'll send around a notice to Ning members about the Tuesday panel if you don't mind - there's plenty of room for anyone to attend virtually even if there might not be enough chairs for it in London ;-)

Comment by Ellen Naylor on March 7, 2010 at 3:17pm

I think it's terrific and I plan to attend from afar as best I can while tending to my Mother-in-Law in DC. Good luck with it all! You have really done a dynamite job with planning!!!

Comment by Andrew Beurschgens on March 7, 2010 at 2:45pm

Ellen, working with Arik, he has enabled it to be webinared and there is an invite pending. Also sent details through Twitter, left quite a few crumbs relative to the features and topics it promises and probably blown every Twitter etiquette there is?!

Comment by Ellen Naylor on February 8, 2010 at 12:06am

Great idea, Andrew! What about SKYPE?

Comment by Arik Johnson on February 7, 2010 at 9:13pm

Great Andrew - looking forward to seeing what results ;-)

Comment by Eric Garland on February 7, 2010 at 3:47pm

Fantastic - that's the point of this umbrella concept, to connect more people in more places with a variety of events in the concept of intelligence. I can't wait to see what you've come up with.

Comment by Andrew Beurschgens on February 7, 2010 at 2:20pm

Thinking of placing the outcome from our UK panel event on 9/3 into this group and on Ning to get people to add their comments after the event and add to the anticipated rich tapestry of comment being generated given the calibre of audience, panel compeer and panelists, me excluded. What do people think?

Comment by Eric Garland on October 5, 2009 at 7:08am

Comment by Eric Garland on October 2, 2009 at 7:38am

Just lining up final details with the venue and our sponsors for the very first Intelligence Collaborative meeting here in Washington. We're expecting around 75 - 100 attendees to join us in Adams Morgan, Washington DC. It should be quiet a blast. More details to follow shortly.

Comment by Sandra Kelly on September 18, 2009 at 1:24am

My opinion: we should share anything that is not proprietary and that we know may be useful to others. Probably it will usually be in response to a question, but sometimes I get really excited when I find something elusive and I might just want to tell someone! I think the emphasis on raising the visibility and credibility of the profession is right on, and I think one of the best ways to do that is to collaborate and share -- it will make us all stronger. Maybe we have a best practice question once a month or something. An online community of practice. Leave the competition aside -- what determines how much business you get is not based on how many sources you have, but how creative you are in using them, and what kind of customer service and value for the money you provide. I just don't believe there are any bad consequences to sharing knowledge -- ever.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page