Competitive Intelligence

Tactical, Operational & Strategic Analysis of Markets, Competitors & Industries

Eric Garland

The Intelligence Collaborative - an introduction

Dear fellow intelligence professionals,

We've been talking for a few weeks now about a collaborative to unify the various types of intelligence out there, to create more connections, and improve the whole concept of using information to solve problems in organizations.

As you have no doubt heard, our inaugural live meeting is October 22nd, this Thursday, here in Washington, DC. Tickets are free, sponsors are buying drinks, and the subject is the use of social media in organizations. Come out out!

I put together a video to help explain to intelligence professionals and others why we need a richer dialogue. Love to hear your thoughts!

Tags: analysis, intelligence, media, networking, social, strategy

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Very well done Eric - let the retweeting begin!

Reply to This

Are you sure those guys in uniform

are really ready, willing and able to collaborate (to work together, esp. for a special purpose) with us? ;-)

Reply to This

Tadeusz, this is a great point. In the "competitive intelligence" side of the house, we have a tendency to think that government people have little in common with us.

Then again, the strategists, market researchers and business development guys think we're the strange ones.

I think that's more to my point about The Intelligence Collaborative - it's time we all started listening to each other, because our mental processes have way more in common than we realize. And since all of our social systems are interconnected, we should be working together for a more rational, humane world.

Reply to This

The thing we have in common is that any and all strategy, policy and decisions should be in response to sound intelligence, a product of the intelligence process. Not the other way around.

Ask Colin Powell what he thinks of this idea; then ask pretty much any CI practitioner you care to meet and you'll see immediately that we have a lot more in common than it would appear on the surface.

Reply to This

I daresay that Colin Powell learned this lesson the hard way back in '02 - '03.

Reply to This

Precisely

Reply to This

The uniform thing is really important - it sends off signals to us because we think, consciously or subconsciously - aha! This guy's culture is more important than his ability to do intelligence. Even if he is the smartest guy in the world, able to capture the meaning behind extremely sensitive patterns and make rock-solid recommendations to his leadership, sometimes he won't be able to speak his mind. We know that the culture of an organization is often more important than its practices.

Now, if we're honest with ourselves, we'll also realize that every private business, corporation and non-profit is in essentially the same situation. And then we'll be to a really useful place, where we realize that this is what defines an intelligence professional - someone as familiar with data and implications and strategy as they are with the realities of our modern bureaucracies.

Reply to This

We know more about using in government information gathered by private business than about using in private business information gathered by government and what's more even Frederick Hitz, whom I quoted ( http://fedcba.ning.com/video/why-spy-the-quoted-fragment-of ) during my blended learning ( http://fedcba.ning.com/group/bi/forum/topics/realistycznie-o-szpieg... ), knows more about those processes developed in China than in the USA. Therefore, do you imagine already today American private business using information gathered by the KGB and Russian private business using information gathered by the CIA? In sum, how much is in today's world room for Intelligence Collaborative and how much is still room for Competitive Intelligence? Let me emphasize--competitive in every meaning of this adjective.

Reply to This

Great video... very professional.... great background and great set-up of the need for: The Intelligence Collaborative.

As for next step: "let's just get talking".... hmmm... that sounds logical, open, fair, etc. However...

My three cents is that it's much better to have someone (or two: Eric & Arik? or a small group) with a vision and passion and SUPERIOR intellect to DRIVE to a stated goal using a clear methodology that can be constructively adapted via input from others who also believe strongly in the group's vision. (Jefferson wrote the first draft of the Declaration of Independence.) The vision and methodology for moving ahead can be defined on one page - and that structure is required to BUILD a growing knowledgebase and membership group with a shared goal.

Otherwise, in two months, someone will look back and say... "Hey, this has been a great conversation, but what do we do now?"
.

Reply to This

Well, ironically, it's been a few of us driving this, and our goal is meetings, media, and training. Our first meeting is Thursday, there's media up at the top of this screen, and we'll probably promote some online training soon. And all of it so far includes a broad concept of intelligence, bringing in gov't intel, business development, strategy, and librarians, if our guest list for Thursday is any indicator.

I think we see eye to eye on this ;-)

Reply to This

Well done Eric - your usual high standard.... Hopefully those of us Down Under will also be able to contribute in some way. Please let me know how the meeting in DC goes.

Best
Babette

Reply to This

Ideal by the book example of Intelligence Collaborative using PPP Model

Check out this Article dated 1st October 09
---------------------------------------------------------------

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/agriculture/Indian...

Indian agri-input companies thrive, thanks to sustained rural demand


The French scanned the environment and BINGO! - Ideal example of PPP MODEL using OODA Loop.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

26th October 09 - News Article which is self-explanatory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://sify.com/news/France-to-help-India-boost-food-processing-sec...

France to help India boost food processing sector

Reply to This

RSS

Latest Activity

Roman V. Romachev added 2 discussions
26 minutes ago
Thanks Arik, very much appreciated indeed. I'll take a listen
15 hours ago
Digimind has several job openings in the CI field and on the vendor side (sales, marketing). More information may be found at http://www.digimind.com/cat/news/jobs For more details contact me.
yesterday
Nicolas Belhassen and Walter Zabaglio joined Competitive Intelligence
yesterday
Hüda Tuzlu and Annette Siegl are now friends
yesterday
on Wednesday
Inteligencia competitiva para los hablamos español o portugués. Inteligência competitiva para os que falamos português ou espanhol
on Wednesday
on Wednesday
Walter, I can answer this one. Ok, first "big data" players usually means HP, Oracle, SAP, IBM. These firms are extraordinarily good at handling structured data (ie numbers) in relational databases, but they don't deal well with unstructured data,…
on Tuesday
Oh, they are doing CI, lots of it, but they call it other things, like Data mining e.g. They solve many of the same problems but from an engineering perspective Klaus
on Tuesday
Walter Zabaglio added a discussion
I've been turning this one over and can't find a satisfactory explanation. Why don't we see more 'big data' players doing CI consulting.  It seems to me that companies like Google, with absurdly comprehensive environmental data, doing more to move…
on Tuesday
Walter Zabaglio and Arik Johnson are now friends
on Tuesday
Arik Johnson Today is the last day to sign up for Wisconsin's Do-Not-Call list http://ping.fm/Styxi
on Tuesday
Tak Takasu and Nate Marlar are now friends
on Tuesday
on Monday
Hey Eric, Very nice, I really like your critical dissection of the author's convoluted and ultimately flawed, thought process which you laid out very articulately. Precisely right, what exactly is the difference here? The issue of direct vs indirec…
on Monday
An event by Andrew Beurschgens was featured
September 16, 2010 from 6pm to 9pm
A Case Study focused on “Smart Grid” Development in China ‘The Battle for China’s Smart Grid’ was a public strategy game run on both sides of the Atlantic by Fuld & Company. It was fascinating to observe European and US perspectives on the Chinese…
on Monday
An event by Rainer Michaeli was featured
ICI-1 - Competitive Intelligence Basics Workshop at Best Western Brandywine Valley Inn
September 9, 2010 at 9am to September 10, 2010 at 6pm
Achieving competitive advantage through systematic competitor and market analysis In times of increasing competition and complex, fast-moving competitive environments, it is important to be one step ahead of the competition. Businesses have to anti…
on Monday
Bill, I'm having trouble imagining you being pilloried for posting jobs during a global recession. I hope we have lots of trouble of this sort coming!
on Monday
So, to take this author's point: Gathering, analyzing and disseminating information sponsored by a major media source financed directly by a combination of pharma, oil, and automotive companies: ethically honorable. Gathering, analyzing and dissem…
on Monday

© 2010   Created by Arik Johnson.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!